Scientists discover ‘the God particle’ •As Clerics insist it represents God

1 Comment » July 9th, 2012 posted by // Categories: Science & Technology

Scientists discover ‘the God particle’ •As Clerics insist it represents God

| Print | E-mail

Written by Kehinde OyetimiSunday, 08 July 2012


altThis 2011 image provide by CERN shows a real CMS proton-proton collision in which four high energy electrons (green lines and red towers) are observed in a 2011 event. The event shows characteristics expected from the decay of a Higgs boson but is also consistent with background Standard Model physics processes. (CERN/Associated Press)

A half-century scientific quest culminated early Wednesday as physicists announced the discovery of a new subatomic particle  one theorized to be so fundamental that without it, nothing could exist.

Dubbed the Higgs boson  or the “God particle,” to the chagrin of scientists  the particle is thought to create a sort of force field that permeates the universe, imbuing everything that we can see and touch with the fundamental property known as mass.

“As a layman I now say, I think we have it,” said Rolf-Dieter Heuer, director general of CERN, the European Organization for Nuclear Research, immediately after physicists presented compelling evidence for the new particle at a seminar in Geneva.

“Do you agree?” he asked the several hundred scientists packing CERN’s main auditorium.

Applause broke out. The video feed from CERN showed Peter Higgs, the University of Edinburgh physicist who theorized the existence of this exotic particle in 1964, tearing up.

“We have a discovery,” said Heuer. “We have discovered a new particle consistent with the Higgs boson. It’s a historic milestone today.”

The scientists at CERN then stood, applauded and cheered for a full minute.

“I have the impression you are all happy,” said Heuer.

Moments later, Higgs stood and said, “For me, it’s really an incredible thing that happened in my lifetime.”

While there were typical scientist-esque notes of caution  a CERN statement called the discovery “preliminary” scientists around the world celebrated the moment.

A video feed from Melbourne, Australia, where an international physics conference is set to begin, showed an auditorium packed with cheering scientists.

“One of the most exciting weeks of my life,” said Joe Lykken, a theoretical physicist who worked on one of the two CERN experiments that found evidence of the new particle.

At Fermilab, long-time home of the U.S. high-energy physics community, some 300 people stuffed into two rooms to watch a video feed from Geneva, said Don Lincoln, a Fermilab physicist who contributed to the CERN experiments.

“It’s incredible,” said Lincoln. “People were riveted. Discovery is what scientists live for.”

At Columbia University in New York, 75 people shared a bottle of champagne brought by experimental physicist Michael Tuts, one of the more than 6,000 scientists who contributed to the discovery.

“I’m still astonished that at 3 a.m. on the Fourth of July you can gather” so many people excited about the arcane field of subatomic physics, Tuts said. High school students, undergraduates, graduate students, and professors all shared the bubbly after the discovery became clear.

“We toasted this,” said Tuts. “It was great fun to see the culmination of years and years of work.”

With a self-imposed deadline of July 4  set two years ago to line up with the conference in Melbourne  CERN physicists raced in recent days to collect and analyze enough data to say they had, indeed, found a new particle that looked like the long-sought Higgs.

As late as Tuesday, two teams pored over results from the last run of high-energy subatomic collisions at the huge Large Hadron Collider straddling the French-Swiss border.

“It’s the last month of running that did it,” said Joe Incandela, spokesman for one of the two experiments at CERN that found evidence of the Higgs, during his presentation Wednesday morning.

The discovery of the new particle completes what’s known as the Standard Model of particle physics, the equivalent of chemistry’s Periodic Table. The Standard Model lists and arranges the particles and forces of nature.

Many of the particles were predicted long before they were found  and the Higgs was the last holdout, and the most important.

That’s because it is thought to give rise to the “Higgs field,” a sort of force field that permeates everything.

“We know the Higgs is at the center of everything,” said Lykken. “This is why [Nobel Prize-winning physicist] Leon Lederman called it the God particle. It talks to all the other particles in some fundamental way.”

When the other particles that make up the stuff of the universe  protons, neutrons, electrons and so on  interact with the Higgs field, they acquire the trait known as mass. More massive objects get tangled up in the field  and hence, slowed down as they move  more than less massive objects.

One way to think of the Higgs field: It’s the water the entire universe swims in.

The CERN physicists did not see this new particle directly, because it disintegrates too quickly. Rather, they divined its existence from sifting through the debris of millions of high-energy subatomic collisions and then searching for clues that the Higgs had been there. It’s like divining the presence of an elusive snow leopard by studying thousands of criss-crossed paw prints.

CERN announced last December that it was homing in on the Higgs, but cautioned that it needed a new batch of high-energy collisions to gain confidence that scientists were seeing something real and not a random bump in the data.

The hunt for the Higgs represented a test for theorists and, at a more nuts-and-bolts level, for the public officials who decided to green-light the extraordinarily elaborate and tricky endeavor to find a hypothetical particle.

An explosion in one of the LHC’s sensitive superconducting magnets in September 2008 delayed operations for more than year. But this biggest of big science experiments now appears to have paid off.

Columbia University physicist Brian Greene, speaking prior to the announcement, said, “Everything I’ve ever done, directly or indirectly, has something to do with a Higgs-like field.”

The discovery of the Higgs is the latest reminder that the universe can be understood through mathematics.

“It makes you feel good as a theorist,” Greene said. “Math really does provide a window on reality!”

In a related twist, clerics have argued that it was representative of the Biblical God. Archbishop Magnus Atilade, the Southwest chairman of the Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN) stated that “those who do not have a science background cannot understand it. It shows that it is establishing the fact that there was a force behind creation in such a way that God was behind it. Those particles did not just happen. It was the spoken word of God that caused the collision that resulted in creation.

“The basis of science is to explain anything that happens. They try to find the rationale. For example, we say that when hydrogen molecules when they combine with oxygen produces water. The force behind it is what we call God.”

Reverend Jesse Majekodunmi, Senior Pastor of the Neighbourhood Church of God also towed the line of thought of Atilade. “God being behind the whole issue of creation is not contestable. Research by scientists have no place in the things of God. They are only there to confuse things. Those who know God will know that God is the ultimate.

There are different kinds of beliefs, it is only those who know God that will know that the almighty God is behind it all,” he argued.

“The Bible does not need authentication. The word of God created the universe. So how can the created challenge the creator?” Pastor Ladi Ayodeji stated.

Additional information from Daily Republic


Opt In Image
Send Me Free Email Updates

(enter your email address below)

One Response to “Scientists discover ‘the God particle’ •As Clerics insist it represents God”

  1. Bob says:

    God is the ultimate cause of the being of the universe. The Higgs Boson is a secondary cause (not an ultimate) cause. William Lane Craig explains this well:

Leave a Reply


Home | About | Contact | Login