![]() |
|
||
|
|
|||
By Dr Ola Ajileye It is the prerogative of any authority to introduce policies that promotes the welfare of their citizenry, but in doing this, it is important to consider in fairness how such policies would impact on others who by reason of a natural global phenomenon, called immigration, have become part and parcel of the jurisdiction in which they live.
“Our decision to introduce a national identity scheme was announced in the Queen's Speech on 17 May 2005. The Identity Cards Act received royal assent, becoming law, on 30 March 2006” On the 25th of September, 2008, the Home Secretary, Ms Jacqui Smith MP announced that a new ID card scheme would be introduced for foreign nationals “We are rolling out biometric residence permits for foreign nationals in 2008, and we expect the first ID cards to be issued to British citizens in 2009”. Since then, I have not stop to wondered whether, this has really been thought through very well by the policy makers and the indication for the introduction of such idea is not narrow and discriminatory socially and financially for those who are intended to subscribe to this. This idea ab initio has been very controversial as it is not been welcomed by a large section of the UK citizenry given the fragile trust many have about the ability of the authority to keep the integrity of their personal information, but more controversial is the fact that this is planned to be forced upon foreign nationals, people, who by virtue of their being migrants here are very vulnerable and are going to be made the guinea pig by the government to test this controversial policy at a fee. This idea has already been described by one MP as a Laminated Poll Tax.
In addition to so many other concerns I ponder on, I have reason to wondered given that historically, the HSMP law again for foreign nationals, mainly highly qualified professionals, was likewise changed sometime ago with attendant confusion and outcry which led to a serious challenge and consequently a judicial review before Sir George Newman, who later concluded in no uncertain terms, the high-handedness, arbitrariness and unfairness of such change. Many affected foreign nationals are yet to recover from the profound professional, social, financial and family damage that change has brought upon them.
Again, I am wondering what is in month of November that, it has now become a month that the community of foreign nationals in the UK should begin to dread and not look forward to, because the government can just wish any law or experimental ideology on them without any recourse for what impact such Gestapo-like variation would have on their livelihood in a foreign land.
But in recent years, records have shown that gradually, a fee was introduced and it has since gone up many folds such that, it may cost up to about £1000 to obtain a work permit or process an HSMP LTR from the home office or extend the student visa or apply for a variation on the visa status. Also the price of ILR has also sky-rocketed far above the reach of most foreign citizens in the
There is always a reason and plausible excuse for this, the same way the reason for introduction of an ID scheme to foreign nationals appear plausible. The argument for it may sound very plausible in the face of global terrorism, managing illegal immigrations or employment. But really, is it really going to stop all these things and why should foreign nationals living in the
Now, a new ID card scheme would mean that potentially, they would have to find means of defraying the cost of that even though they already possess an ID in the form of their international passport and all their records and data are within the possession of the
The argument for the need to introduce this new ID scheme to combat Illegal working, may sound very plausible from the point of view of the government, but is it a popular view amongst UK citizens who in one way or another have been associated to people from different backgrounds and ethnicity either by marriage or one form of relationship or the other? Given this fact, should it not be a better investment on the part of the UK government to consider giving an Identity to those people who by virtue of their immigration status, have been driven underground and do not have an official ID but yet have been law abiding and have been contributing albeit, as a result of underground working, pay their little taxes and token to the development of the UK economy and have not in any shape or form constitute a burden to any UK public services? There are many untapped skills that would be worth the investment of the
Introducing a New ID card only for foreign nationals is an expenditure that will be taken from the public purse and given that it will not be a free service targeted at the foreign citizens in the
Disclaimer This article is not at all an attempt to castigate, malign or unduly criticise the good intention of the British government through the Home Office activities in making
Dr Olayiwola Ajileye writes from the
Receive Email Updates
(1,685 Subscribers) Related Articles
Recent Commentary Popular Articles
Share This Page
Olayiwola Ajileye contributes articles to NigerianMuse. To view more of Olayiwola's articles, please go here If you've enjoyed this here on NigerianMuse, you are welcome to join our community. Stay Tuned via RSS ...
Bookmark this Page ...
Twitter Comments About this Article ...
None Yet
Responses So Far ...
Add Your Comments ...
|
| |||||