Punch missing Okigbo report December 28, 2006 | posted by Nigerian Muse (Archives)
|
The Missing Okigbo Panel Report
Punch Editorial
Tuesday November 18, 2003
At the beginning of this month, this newspaper made a startling revelation on
the missing report of the Pius Okigbo Panel of Inquiry, set up by the late Gen.
Sani Abacha junta in 1994 to probe how the $12.4 billion oil windfall earned by
the nation during the first Gulf War in 1991 was spent. The newspaper arrived at
the conclusion after a two-month- long search for the report at the relevant
quarters, including the office of the Secretary to the Government of the
Federation (SGF) and the Department of National Archives at the Federal Ministry
of Information and National Orientation, could not provide a clue to the
whereabouts of the report. The current SGF, Chief Ufot Ekaette, happened to be a
member of the Okigbo panel.
A summary of the panel’s report submitted to the Federal Government revealed
that Gen. Ibrahim Babangida’s regime conspired with top officials of the Central
Bank of Nigeria (CBN) and squandered the entire fortune on unproductive or
dubious projects. It was shown that out of the $12.4 billion, $12.2 billion was
disbursed, leaving a balance of $206.037 million. The money, according to the
summary, was frittered away through “Dedicated Accounts”, which were not
accessible to auditors. It may be recalled that William Keeling, a Financial
Times of London correspondent in Nigeria then, was hurriedly deported because of
his incisive report on the windfall. Since the summary of the report was made
public, many have called for the release of details of the findings to no avail.
Okigbo, a renowned economist, passed on in 2000.
In response to the PUNCH’s publication on the missing panel report, the FG
reacted last week, saying it was searching for the document. A terse statement
which emanated from the SGF’s office simply said: “ The report is not lost. It’s
with the Federal Government.” The PUNCH has since written the Presidency for
assistance in locating the report.
Like its predecessors, this administration has routinely raised the public’s
hope by setting up inquiries to investigate puzzling issues of national
importance. The latest of such panels include the two separate committees
reportedly inaugurated by the FG last week to investigate the N12 billion debt
incurred by the Federal Airports Authority of Nigeria (FAAN) and the contracts
awarded by the establishment.
There are scores of others. Some prominent ones include the Christopher Kolade
panel set up by the FG in 1999 to review contracts awarded by the Abdulsalami
Abubakar regime between January and May 1999; the Oluwole Rotimi panel that
investigated FG’s landed property nationwide and the Chukwudifu Oputa panel on
rights violations. Others are panels on several air disasters, the January 27,
2002 Lagos bomb blasts, recent fire incidents at the local and international
wings of the Murtala Muhammed International Airport, the Idris Kuta panel on the
Senate, which was later reviewed by the Oyofo Committee, et ce tera. Not a few
Nigerians implicated by these probes still walk tall in the streets as free men,
while some of them are holding or eyeing sensitive public offices. The FG has
been implementing the 1994 Kayode Eso report on the judiciary most reluctantly.
The non-availability of a document of profound importance as the Okigbo Panel
report is a tell tale clue on the contempt with which officialdom holds the
anti-corruption campaign. It is tragic that probes in the country scarcely lead
to punishment for culprits or the furtherance of justice and transparency in
public life. The fate of past probes and the reports therefrom confirm the
painful fact that inquiries have become tools used to divert public attention
from official corruption, ineptitude and other crimes, or to intimidate and
blackmail political opponents. The authorities concerned owe the nation a duty
to produce the report by whatever means possible. For, even if the FG lacks the
political will to implement it, the public have the right to preserve the report
for posterity.
Twitter Comments About this Article ...